SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1285

ANIL R.DAVE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
K. Mallesh – Appellant
Versus
K. Narender – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Nitya Ramakrishnan, Gunet Kaur and Anitha Shenoy, Advocates.
For the Respondents:A.K. Ganguli, Senior Advocate, K. Swami, Prabha Swami and P.V. Yogeswaran, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Anil R. Dave, J. - Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the impugned order, we find that the said order passed at an interlocutory stage, during the pendency of the suit. The question is with regard to the admissibility of two documents.

2. In our opinion the High Court should not have interfered at the stage when the trial was still in progress. Therefore, we set aside the impugned order passed by the High Court without going into the merits of the case. We say that the admissibility, reliability and registrability of the documents shall be considered independently only at the time of hearing of the trial and not prior thereto. All questions with regard to the aforesaid issues shall remain open.

3. The appeals are disposed of as allowed.

4. No order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top