SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1243

P.SATHASIVAM, B.S.CHAUHAN
Sanjay Dutt – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra Tr. CBI, Bombay – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicants: Mr. H.N. Salve, Mr. Uday U. Lalit, Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Mr. Prasenjit Keswani, Mr. Surendra Dube, Ms. Sonia Dube, Mr. Shatadru Chakraborty, Mr. Anurag Singh, Ms. Kripa Pandit, M/S. Legal Options
For the Respondents: Mr. Harin P. Raval, Mr. Mukul Gupta, Mr. Anando Mukherjee, Ms. Divya Anand, Mr. B.V. Balramdas, Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. H.N. Salve, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and Mr. H.P. Raval, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances and also various reasons stated in the application though we are not inclined to extend time as prayed for by the applicant, however, we extend further time to surrender by another four weeks' from tomorrow i.e. 18th April, 2013.

3. It is made clear that no further extension will be granted. Mr. H.N. Salve, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant assured that no further petition will be moved in future. The above statement is recorded. With the above direction, Crl.M.P. for extension of time to surrender is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top