HARJIT SINGH BEDI, CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Chothu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at very great length.
2. There are three appeals before us : Criminal Appeal No. 98 of 2007 which has been filed by the complainant impugning the acquittal of Khuma Ram whereas Criminal Appeal No. 963 of 2008 has been filed by the State of Rajasthan impugning the acquittal of Raju for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and his conviction under section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code and the third has been filed by the State of Rajasthan being Criminal Appeal No. 964 of 2007 impugning the acquittal of Khuma Ram. In the course of the trial, 13 persons were tried in Sessions Case No. 34 of 1999 for offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the IPC. The trial court in its judgment dated 4th January, 2001 convicted the accused as under:
"The accused Raju @ Raj Kumar is hereby held guilty for committing offence under Section 302, 323 r/2 149, 147 IPC and Section 3/25 and 3/27 of arms Act but he is acquitted from the offence punishable under Section 302 r/2 Section 34 and 149, 448 IPC.
"The accused Shankar is found guilty for committing offence under Section 147, 323, 4/w 149 IPC an Section 30 of arms Act but
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.