SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1280

ANIL R.DAVE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Chairman, Gwalior Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Prerna Mehta and Chiraranjan Addey, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Prashant Shukla, Anushreee Mishra, Rani Kumari and Nikilesh Ramachandran, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Anil R. Dave, J. - Heard the learned counsel.

2. Leave granted.

3. We see no justifiable reason warranting payment of back wages to the respondents, who were appointed without following any procedure of law and moreover, the High Court has not assigned any reason for which 50% back wages have been granted to the respondents. In the circumstances, the directions given by the High Court regarding payment of back wages is set aside.

4. The appeals are allowed with no order as to costs.

5. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top