SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1279

DIPAK MISRA, R.BANUMATHI
Wildlife Rescue And Rehabilitation Centre – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Shibani Ghosh, Ms. Tanima Kishore, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG, Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., Ms. Morita, Advocate, Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, AOR.
For the Intervenor (IA 4) : Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. K. Parameshwar, AOR.
For the Applicant :Mr. Siddharth Ludhra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Supriya Juneja, AOR Mr. Viraj Gandhi, Ms. Mehaak Jaggi, Advocates, Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, AOR.
For the Applicants :Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR Mr. Sinoj K. Narayanan, Mr. Mukti Choudhary, AOR, Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jogy Scaria, AOR, Gp. Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, Mr. T. Gopal, Ms. Neha Meena, Mr. R. Hemendra Sharma, Ms. Madurima Ghosh, Mr. K.S. Bhati, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Ms.Monika Sharma, , Mr. Sanchar Anand, AAG Mr. Anant Kvtsya, Mr. Apoorv Singhal, Mr. Gopal Singh, Mr. Chandan Kumar, Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Sr. Adv. Mr. B. Balaji, AOR Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Mr. R. Shase, Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv. Mr. K. Rajeev, Mr. Shinjoj K. Narayanan, Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, AAG Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Mr. Devendra Singh, Mr. A Raghunath, Advocates.

ORDER

The present IAs relate to the cruelties meted out to the elephants in the State of Kerala and how they are required to be curbed.

2. There is no cavil over the fact that the State of Kerala has a number of elephants owned by private individuals. Section 40 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (for brevity "the 1972 Act") deals with declarations. The said provision reads as follows :

"40. Declarations. - (1) Every person having at the commencement of this Act the control, custody or possession of any captive animal specified in Schedule I or Part II of Schedule II, or animal article, trophy or uncured trophy derived from such animal or salted or dried skins of such animal or the musk of a musk deer or the horn of a rhinoceros, shall, within thirty days from the commencement of this Act, declare to the Chief Wildlife Warden or the authorised officer the number and description of the animal, or article of the foregoing description under his control, custody or possession and the place where such animal or article is kept.

2. No person shall, after the commencement of this Act, acquire, receive, keep in his control, custody or possession, sell, offer for sale or otherwise transfer










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top