SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 211

RANJAN GOGOI, PRAFULLA C.PANT
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Prafulla C. Pant, J.

These appeals preferred under section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 are directed against orders dated 02.07.2012 and 08.11.2012 respectively, passed by Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi (for short “the Tribunal”), whereby Appeal No. 123 of 2011 was allowed and Review Petition No. 09 of 2012 filed against that order was dismissed by the Tribunal, and matter was remanded back to Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) for re-determination of date of commercial operations (COD) of 400 KV Barh-Balia double circuit transmission?

2. The issue involved in the present case is as to:-

Whether the new transmission line charged from one end by the transmission licensee without switchgear, protection system and metering arrangement (not in the scope of works of the transmission licensee) at the other end could not have been commissioned for the purpose of raising transmission charges against the beneficiaries in the light of second Proviso to clause (c) of Regulation 2 of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms & Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2009 (for short “Regulations, 2009”)?

3. We have heard Learned Counsel for the parties a
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top