SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 330

KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Raijibhai Bhikhabhai Parmar – Appellant
Versus
Reliance Industries Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Kurian, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The limited grievance of the appellants is on the direction to deposit the amounts already received by them at the time of the alleged cessation of employment with the respondents as a pre-condition for the Labour Court to enter adjudication on the grievance raised by the employees.

3. Having heard Mr. R.P. Bhatt, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr. C.U. Singh, learned senior Counsel appearing for the respondents, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the interest of justice would be advanced if the direction of the High Court to deposit the amounts already received by appellants at the time of cessation, is partly modified.

4. Accordingly, we dispose of the appeal permitting the appellants to deposit 50% of the gross VRS amount (which does not include P.F. Gratuity, etc.) within a period of three months from today.

5. The Labour Court, Vadodara will decide the Reference within a period of three months from the date of deposit as above.

6. The appeal is disposed of as above. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top