SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 348

KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Kurian, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The issue in these appeals pertains to the claim for higher compensation claimed by the appellants. The learned counsel for the State of Haryana fairly submitted that the claim for compensation is covered by the decision of this Court in "Sachin & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors." passed in Civil Appeal No. 3412 of 2015, decided on 31.03.2015, whereby the cut in the development charges has been reduced from 40% to 30%.

3. Therefore, these appeals are disposed of in terms of the above referred Judgment.

4. We make it clear that in these appeals, the appellants will not be entitled to statutory benefits for the period of delay in refiling the petitions before this Court.

No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top