FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Mohd. Jalees Ansari – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Uday U. Lalit, J.
1. This appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as TADA Act) challenges the judgment and final order dated 28.02.2004 passed by the Designated Court Ajmer, Rajasthan in TADA Special Case No. 6 of 1994. Originally sixteen accused persons were tried for having committed offences under TADA Act and other enactments. Accused No.6 Irfan Ahmad escaped from custody while the trial was going on and therefore his case was separated. He was later arrested in June, 2015 and is now being proceeded against separately. Accused No. 12 Mohd. Azeemuddin though convicted and sentenced by the Designated Court was found to be juvenile on the date of occurrence in this appeal and as such his case stands separated. All the other accused namely A-1 to A-5, A-7 to A-11 and A-13 to A-16 are presently in appeal.
2. There were bomb blasts in various trains during the night intervening 5th and 6th of December, 1993.
(i) An explosion occurred around 10:50 p.m. on 05.12.1993 in Rajdhani Express running from N
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra
Rangku Dutta v. State of Assam
Ashrafkhan v. State of Gujarat
State of Gujarat v. Mohd. Atiq
State of Rajasthan v. Bhoop Singh
Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra
Rangku Dutta v. State of Assam
Ashrafkhan v. State of Gujarat
State of Gujarat v. Mohd. Atiq
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.