ANIL R.DAVE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Tota Ram – Appellant
Versus
Belliss India (Private) Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL R. DAVE, J.
Leave granted.
2. Though the respondent has not been served, looking at the peculiar facts of the case, we have taken up the cases for hearing.
3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant-workman.
4. On 1st February, 2016, the following order was passed by this Court :-
“Issue notice by speed post, returnable on 1st April, 2016, confined only to the question with regard to payment of compensation to be paid to the petitioner in a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs (rupees two and a half lakhs only) towards full and final settlement.”
5. Looking at the peculiar facts of the case, we think that it will be appropriate if the appellant-workman is duly compensated as he had worked for about 14 years. Therefore, we direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs (rupees two and a half lakhs only) to the appellant-workman in full and final settlement so that the appellant-workman may not be re-instated with back-wages.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant-workman has agreed to accept the aforesaid amount. The said amount shall be paid by the respondent to the appellant-workman within three months from the date of production of a copy of this order.
7. If the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.