SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 443

ANIL R.DAVE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Tota Ram – Appellant
Versus
Belliss India (Private) Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

ANIL R. DAVE, J.

Leave granted.

2. Though the respondent has not been served, looking at the peculiar facts of the case, we have taken up the cases for hearing.

3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant-workman.

4. On 1st February, 2016, the following order was passed by this Court :-

“Issue notice by speed post, returnable on 1st April, 2016, confined only to the question with regard to payment of compensation to be paid to the petitioner in a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs (rupees two and a half lakhs only) towards full and final settlement.”

5. Looking at the peculiar facts of the case, we think that it will be appropriate if the appellant-workman is duly compensated as he had worked for about 14 years. Therefore, we direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs (rupees two and a half lakhs only) to the appellant-workman in full and final settlement so that the appellant-workman may not be re-instated with back-wages.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant-workman has agreed to accept the aforesaid amount. The said amount shall be paid by the respondent to the appellant-workman within three months from the date of production of a copy of this order.

7. If the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top