SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 630

KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Girish S/o Dharmavir Madan Through its GPA – Appellant
Versus
Nandkumar S/o Shankarrao Rasne – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Kurian, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The only submission of the appellant is that unless his 3/7th share of the property is identified as per the preliminary decree dated 06.12.2004, the eviction proceedings at the instance of the first respondent may not be proceeded with.

3. Therefore, these appeals are disposed of with a direction to the trial court to take steps to appoint the Court Commissioner in the final decree proceedings so as to identify the respective shares. The process of identification of the respective shares shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this Judgment by either party before the trial court. Till such time, the eviction proceedings as against the appellant shall be kept in abeyance.

4. However, by way of abundant caution, it is made clear that the special leave petition filed against the Judgment in Second Appeal No. 611 of 2010 shall have no bearing on the eviction proceedings.

No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top