SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 667

DIPAK MISRA, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Bharwad Navghanbhaj Jakshibhai – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. These appeals by special leave at the instance of original accused Nos.2 to 14, seek to challenge the common judgment and order dated 10.03.2016 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal Nos.947/2011 and 969 of 2011.

2. Fourteen accused including appellants 1 to 13 were convicted and sentenced by Sessions Judge, Patan in Sessions Case No.27 of 2008 as under:-      

1 to 14

u/s 147, 148 IPC

Fine of Rs.1000/-, i/d no separate imprisonment.

1 and 7

u/s 326 r/w 149 IPC

R.I. of 2 years + Rs.35,000/-(towards compensation)

2 to 6 and 8 to 14

u/s 326 r/w 149 IPC

R.I. of 2 years+ Rs.500/-, i/d 10 days.

1 to 14

u/s 324 and 149 IPC

Fine of Rs.2000/-, i/d 15 days

1 to 14

u/s 325 r/w 149 IPC

R.I. of 2 years

1 to 14

504, 506(2) r/w 149 IPC

No separate sentence is passed as the accused are already convicted under Section 326 IPC

3. All the convicted accused, being aggrieved preferred Criminal Appeal No.947 of 2011 while the State preferred Criminal Appeal No.969 of 2011 seeking enhancement of the sentence imposed b






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top