SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 736

R.BANUMATHI, ANIL R.DAVE, A.K.SIKRI, R.K.AGRAWAL, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Jainarayan Chouksey – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:- P.S. Narsimha, Addl. Solicitor General(A.C.), Ms. Madhavi Divan (A.C.), P.S. Patwalia, ASG, Purushaindra, AAG (M.P.), Mishra Saurabh, Archit Upadhayay, Dhruv Sheoran, Rajat Singh, Ms. Natasha Vinayak, Ms. Pratibha Jain, Amit Kumar, Shaurya Sahay, Avijit Mani Tripathi, Ms. Rekha Bakshi, A. Sharan, Sr. Adv., Amit Anand Tiwari, Abhinav Raghuvanshi, Advocates.
For the Respondents UOI:- Mukul Rohtagi, AG, Ranjit Kumar, SG, R.K. Rathore, Ms. Binu Tamta, Ms. Rekha Pandey, Ajay Sharma, Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv., Jasbir Singh Malik, Ms. Usha Nandini. V, Amalpushp Shroti, Advocates.
For the State of Chattisgarh :- A.P. Mayee, A. Selvin Raja, Suryanarayana Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv., Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv., Ajay Gupta, A. Shroti, Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Sumeer Sodhi, Varun Chopra, Arjun Nanda, Praval Arora, Sachin Pujari, Rishabh Sancheti, (for M/s. M.V. Kini & Associates), Ms. Pratibha Jain, Ms. Manju Jetley, R.C. Kohli, Sunil Kumar Jain, Amit Kumar, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Abhinav Mukerji, Sanjay K. Agrawal, Harish Pandy, Advocates.
For the (MCI) :- Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv., Gaurav Sharma, Prateek Bhatia, Dhawal Mohan, Ms. Vara Gaur, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Ms. Deepieka Kalia, Pawanshree Agrawal, T.R.B. Sivakumar, Advocates.
For the (St. of Rajasthan) :- S.S. Shamshery, Amit Sharma, Prateek Yadav, Ankit Raj, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocates.

ORDER

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. We observe that mandate of our judgment was to hold centralised entrance test followed by centralised state counselling by the State to make it a one composite process. We, therefore, direct that admission to all medical seats shall be conducted by centralised counselling only by the State Government and none else.

2. If any counselling has been done by any College or University and any admission to any medical seat has been given so far, such admission shall stand cancelled forthwith and admission shall be given only as per centralised counselling done by the State Government.

3. We may note at this stage that the State Government has done the first counselling. However, the learned Additional Solicitor General has made a statement at the Bar that the State Government is ready to undertake the entire process afresh and assures that it would be completed by 30th September, 2016 which is the last date for admission. We also feel that it is a proper course of action inasmuch as it will enable the private institutions to send their representatives at the place of counselling as per the information which may be displayed b



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top