SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 801

ANIL R.DAVE, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Mahesh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :- Niraj Sharma, Sumit Kumar Sharma, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Leave granted.

2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the land in question is similar to the land which was covered under the judgment of this Court in First Appeal No. 497 of 2012. In view of the said fact, the compensation awarded to the appellant is enhanced so as to bring it at par with the lands covered under judgment dated 19.12.2014 delivered in Subhash s/o Kashiram v. State of M.P. & Anr.

3. If the respondents are aggrieved by this Order, it will be open to the respondents to approach this Court by way of an application so that the matter can be reconsidered.

4. It is clarified that no interest shall be paid in respect of the period for which the filing of petition in the High Court had been delayed.

5. The appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top