SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 885

ANIL R.DAVE, PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, AMITAVA ROY
In Re: The Punjab Termination of Agreement Act, 2004 – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :- Dinesh Kumar Garg, Advocate.
For the Respondent:- Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv., Baldev Raj Mahajan, AG, Haryana, Anish Kumar Gupta, AAG, Haryana, Anil Grover, AAG, Haryana, Devendra Saini, AAG, Haryana, Arun Kumar, AAG, Haryana, Baldev Krishna Satija, AAG, Amit Kumar, AAG, Haryana, Chandra Shekhar Suman, R.K. Rajvanshi, Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati, Shekhar Raj Sharma, Devashish Bharukha, Ravi Bharuka, Ms. Priyanka Parida, Sanjay Kumar Visen, J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv., Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR, Chandra Nand Jha, Chirag M. Shroff, AOR, Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR, Sunil Fernandes, AOR, Ms. Astha Sharma, Ms. Mithu Jain, Puneeth K.G., S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Shiv Mangal Sharma, Puneet Parihar, Shrey Kapoor, Saurabh Rajpal, Arjun Kumar, Sitesh N. Singh, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR, VikramJeet Bajermee, Amit Sharma, S. Wasim A. Qadri, D.S. Mahra, AOR, Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR, R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv., Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

The following is the opinion of the Court:

Anil R. Dave, J. - By a Reference dated 22nd July, 2004, Hon'ble the President of India made a request for an advisory opinion to this Court under Article 143 (1) of the Constitution of India, in relation to enactment of the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as "the Punjab Act") by the State of Punjab.

2. The text of the Reference referred to for the consideration & opinion of this Court is as follows:-

"WHERAS the Indus Basin comprises the rivers Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas and Sutlej;

WHEREAS the Indus Water Treaty 1960 was entered into between the Governments of India and Pakistan on 19th September, 1960, under which India is entitled to the free, unrestricted use of the waters of the Ravi, Beas and Sutlej till they finally cross into Pakistan;

WHEREAS while at the time of signing the said treaty, the waters of Sutlej had already been planned to be utilised for the Bhakra-Nangal Project, the surplus flow of rivers Ravi and Beas, over and above the pre-partition use, was allocated by the Agreeme





































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top