DALVEER BHANDARI, DIPAK MISRA
R. K. Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Jag Pravesh Sharma – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This is an application filed by the landlord who is respondent in the Special Leave Petition praying that the non-applicant tenant is merely paying Rs. 175/- per month which was fixed decades ago, is grossly disproportionate to the market rent prevailing in the said area.
2. The applicant-landlord had filed an application for eviction of the non- applicant - tenant under Section 14(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act on the ground of bona fide requirement. The said eviction suit was decreed by the learned Additional Rent Controller vide order dated 18th May, 2010.
3. Aggrieved by the said order, the non-applicant - tenant filed a Revision Petition before the Delhi High Court. The tenant prayed for stay of execution of the eviction decree against him. When the said stay application came up for consideration before the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court on 24th August, 2011, the applicant-landlord pointed out that the market rent of the suit property would be around Rs. 50,000/- per month and therefore, it was prayed that the petitioner- tenant be directed to pay the market rent from the date of the eviction decree in view of the judgment of this Court in Atma Ram Prop
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.