Back
P. SATHASIVAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, RANJAN GOGOI
A. M. Sangappa @ Sangappa – Appellant
Versus
Sangondeppa – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 19.08.2006 passed in Regular First Appeal No. 238 of 2004.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant, after taking us through the impugned judgment, submitted that the same cannot be sustained since being a Regular First Appeal the High Court ought to have considered the evidence on record and findings recorded by the trial Judge. In other words, according to the counsel, the impugned judgment and order cannot be sustained in the absence of appreciation of evidence and acceptability of the findings recorded by the trial Court.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents supported the impugned decision of the High Court.
5. In the light of the limited submission, we have carefully perused the reasoning of the High Court and we agree with the contention raised by the counsel for the appellant.
6. In a series of decisions, this Court has highlighted how a regular first appeal is to be disposed of, particularly, in the light of Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. It mandates that the appellate Court has to frame points for determination, decision thereon, reasons for the decision and where the decree appealed from is reversed or
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
