Back
A.K.SIKRI, N.V.RAMANA
VISHRAM @ PRASAD GOVEKAR – Appellant
Versus
SUDESH GOVEKAR (D) BY LRS. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.K. Sikri, J. - Leave granted.
2. It is a property dispute between the parties who are related to each other. It becomes desirable to take note of their relationship before proceeding with the factual background that led to the dispute. Following is the sketch of the family tree which describes the parties:
| LATE JAGANNATH GOVEKAR | | Lato Lilavati (Defendant-3/Respondent-6) | ||||
| ____________________ | Son | | _______ | ________ | ________ | ________|_______________ | Son | |
| ________|_______ | Late Vasudev | __________|__________ | Vishram – wife – Sunita (Def-1/Pet-1) (Def-2/Pet-2) | ||||
| ___________|___________ | Son ____________________ | ______ | Daughter _______ | __________________ | Son in law _______________ | |||
| | Sudesh-wife–Susheela (Plaintiff-1/R-1)\(Plf-2/R-2) | | Aarti (Plf-3/R-3) | | Sanjeev (Plf-4/R-4) | | Ramdas (Plf-5/R-5) | _________|____________ Harsdas (Def-4/Pet-3) | |
| ________________ | |||||
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
