KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH GUPTA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.F. Nariman, J.
Leave granted.
1. The Constitution of India is a mosaic drawn from the experience of nations worldwide. The federal structure of this Constitution is largely reflected in Part XI which is largely drawn from the Government of India Act, 1935. The State of Jammu & Kashmir is a part of this federal structure. Due to historical reasons, it is a State which is accorded special treatment within the framework of the Constitution of India. This case is all about the State of Jammu & Kashmir vis`-a-vis` the Union of India, in so far as legislative relations between the two are concerned.
2. The present appeals arise out of a judgment dated 16.7.2015 passed by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu, in which it has been held that various key provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "SARFAESI") were outside the legislative competence of Parliament, as they would collide with Section 140 of the Transfer of Property Act of Jammu & Kashmir, 1920. The said Act has been held to be inapplicable to banks such as the State Bank of India which are all India banks.
3. Befo
State of West Bengal v. Union of India
Prem Nath Kaul v. State of Jammu & Kashmir
Sampat Prakash v. the State of Jammu & Kashmir
Puranlal Lakhanpal v. President of India
Union of India v. Delhi High Court Bar Association
Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala
State of Jammu & Kashmir v. M.S. Farooqui
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.