SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 113

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MADAN B. LOKUR, PRAFULLA C. PANT, JJ.
PUKHRAJMAL SAGARMAL LUNKAD (D) THROUGH HIS L.RS. AND OTHERS ETC. – APPELLANTS
VERSUS
THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, JALGAON AND OTHERS – RESPONDENTS
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 491 OF 2007
Decided On : 03-02-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Dr. Kailash Chand, Adv.
For the Respondents: Shivaji M. Jadhav, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
Section 126 deals with Plans as well as Schemes, but Section 127 does not refer to Town Planning Schemes.

Headnote:(a) Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 – Section 126 and 127 – Town Planning Scheme – Section 126 deals with Plans as well as Schemes – But, Section 127 does not refer to Town Planning Schemes. (Para 10)

       (b) Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 – Section 127 – Prayer specifically in respect of Town Planning Scheme No. III, finally sanctioned – Compensation determined by arbitrator – Award published in official gazette – Appeal dismissed – Section 127 not applicable – High Court rightly dismissing the writ petitions. (Para 14)

       (c) Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 – Chapters III, V and VII – Sections 88. 126 and 127 – Development plans are dealt with in chapter III, Town planning in Chapter V and secti0n 126 and 127 occur in chapter VII – For land required under Town Planning Scheme the steps under Section 126 or 127 are not to be resorted to – Instantly, Draft Town Planning Scheme published in 1976, arbitrator determining compensation in 1980, appeal dismissed by Tribunal in 1987, sanctioned in 1993 by following prescribed procedure – Held proper. (Para 15)

       (2007) 7 SCC 555 – Distinguished

       Facts of the case:

       In the Writ Petitions, Town Planning Scheme in respect of survey No. 431/A and survey No. 431/B situated at Mehrun area within the limits of Municipal Council Jalgaon, was sought to be quashed.

       Appellants were owners of survey No. 431/A-1, A-2 and A-3 and survey No. 431/B. On 15.12.1971, Jalgaon Municipal Council published Draft Development Plan in respect of certain lands including the aforementioned plots owned by the appellants and reserved the same for public purpose, renumbering them as plot No. 288 in reservation site No. 107 (for garden) and plot No. 287 reserved in site Nos. 104 and 105 (for the purposes of construction of library, maternity home and dispensary). Final Development Plan was sanctioned in respect of above area which came into operation on 16.12.1974.

       On 15.12.1984 ten years stood expired from the date coming into operation of final Development Plan, and the respondents failed to acquire the land. As such, the original appellants/land owners sent a notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act to the Planning Authority, Jalgaon Municipal Council on 7.10.1986, but even after receipt of such notice, the Municipal Council failed to take steps for acquisition of the appellants' land reserved for public purpose within the period of six months, and consequently, the land stood released from the reservation. But when in spite of repeated representations no orders were passed by the Planning Authority releasing the land, the appellants filed Writ Petitions seeking writ of mandamus to quash the reservation of the appellants' land for Town Planning Scheme.

       The High Court dismissed the writ petitions.

       Finding of the Court:

       There is no infirmity in the impugned judgment.

       Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Prafulla C. Pant, J.

This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 23.12.2004, passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, whereby said Court has dismissed the Writ Petition No. 1924 of 1992. And for the reasons given in the said order, the other two Writ Petition Nos. 1925 of 1992 and 1228 of 2001 were also dismissed.

2. In the above Writ Petitions (Nos. 1924 of 1992 and 1925 of 1992), Town Planning Scheme in respect of survey No. 431/A (new plot No. 287) and survey No. 431/B (new plot No. 288) situated at Mehrun area within the limits of Municipal Council Jalgaon, was sought to be quashed.

3. Brief facts of the case are that appellants were admittedly owners of survey No. 431/A-1, A-2 and A-3 and survey No. 431/B. On 15.12.1971, Jalgaon Municipal Council which is a Planning Authority under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short "MRTP Act"), published Draft Development Plan in respect of certain lands including the aforementioned plots owned by the appellants and reserved the same for public purpose, renumbering them as plot No. 288 in reservation site No. 107 (for garden) and plot No. 287 reserved in site Nos. 104 and 105 (for the purposes of construction of library, maternity home and dispensary). Final Development Plan was sanctioned in respect of above area which came into operation on 16.12.1974. According to the appellants, this date is the starting point for taking steps for acquisition within a period of ten years under MRTP Act, as the owners got restricted/prevented from carrying out any developmental activities over their land. It is pleaded by them that the procedure for acquisition of the land reserved for public purpose is provided under Chapter VII, which allowed at the relevant point of time only two modes of acquisition under Section 126 (1) of the MRTP Act, namely - (i) by agreement, and (ii) by making an application to the State Government for acquiring such land under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

4. Section 127 of the MRTP Act, provides that if any land reserved, allotted or designated for any purpose specified in any plan under the Act, is not acquired by agreement within ten years from the date on which the final Regional Plan or final Development Plan came into force or if proceedings under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, are not commenced within such period, the owner or any person interested in the land, may serve notice on the Planning Authority, Development Authority or Appropriate Authority, as the case may be, and if within six months of such notice, the land is not acquired or no steps, as aforesaid, are commenced for the acquisition, the reservation, allotment or designation shall be deemed to have lapsed, and thereupon the land shall be deemed to be released from the reservation, allotment or designation, and shall become available to the owner for the purpose of development as otherwise permissible in the case of adjacent land under the relevant plan.

5. The appellants' case is that on 15.12.1984 ten years stood expired from the date coming into operation of final Development Plan, and the respondents failed to acquire the land. As such, the original appellants/land owners sent a notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act to the Planning Authority, Jalgaon Municipal Council on 7.10.1986, but even after receipt of such notice, the Municipal Council failed to take steps for acquisition of the appellants' land reserved for public purpose within the period of six months, and consequently, the land stood released from the reservation. But when in spite of repeated representations no orders were passed by the Planning Authority releasing the land, the appellants filed Writ Petition Nos. 1924 of 1992 and 1925 of 1992 qua survey Nos. 431/A and 431/B respectively, seeking writ of mandamus to quash the reservation of the appellants' land for Town Planning Scheme.

6. On the other hand, on behalf of the Planning Authority/Jalgaon Municipal Council,

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top