JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

The appellant approached this Court, aggrieved by the order dated 25.11.2009 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in F.A.O. No.276-M of 2005, whereby the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was dissolved by a decree of divorce.

2. Since the appellant was appearing in person, we sought the assistance of Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned senior counsel as Amicus Curiae.

3. After hearing the parties and the learned amicus curiae, this Court on 10.08.2016 passed the following order:

“Both the parties are present in Court today.

We have heard learned Amicus Curiae appearing for the appellant-wife as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-husband.

It is very clear that the parties are no more interested in maintaining their relationship. The only question left for consideration is whether decree of divorce as granted by the High Court should be disturbed or not.

Having heard learned counsel for both the parties, we are of the view that decree of divorce granted as per the impugned order passed by the High Court should be affirmed.

However, we are informed that the question of interim maintenance is pending before the Distr