MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 Supreme(SC) 161

ARUN MISHRA, AMITAVA ROY
MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant(s) : Mr. A. Sharan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv., Mr. Prithvi Pal, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Raghava Charyulu, Adv.(Spl. P.P.), Mr. Kailash Pandey, Adv., Mr. K. V. Sreekumar,Advs.

ORDER

1. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that paragraph 19 of the order passed by this Court on 6th February, 2017 be read as under:

“19. In the above view of the matter, the appeal is allowed and the appellant is ordered to be released on bail in FIR RC-04/S/2014-(SIT) Kolkata on furnishing bond of Rs.1 (One) crore and on furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal and also subject to the following conditions.....”

2. We also make it clear that the appellant is not required to make a cash deposit of the aforesaid amount and execution of bond therefor would suffice. The requirement of local sureties is hereby relaxed as well.

3. Rest of the order remains intact.

4. Criminal Misc. Petition for modification stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document