SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 182

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. A. BOBDE, L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. – Appellant(s)
Versus
SHAIK MAHIBULLA SHARIEF – Respondent(s)
CIVIL APPEAL No.3094 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.26876 of 2016)
Decided On : 22-02-2017

IMPORTANT POINT
There can be no discrimination in appointment of similarly situated persons. A person having requisite educational qualification cannot be denied appointment.
A degree once considered to be recognised as equivalent in one year cannot be denied in the next year.

Headnote:Service Law – Appointment – Post of Language Pandit (Telugu) Grade-II – Andhra Pradesh Direct Recruitment for the post of Teachers (Scheme of Selection) Rules, 2012 – Rule 4 (2) (iii) (a) – High Court approved judgment of Tribunal on ground that Respondent possessed a degree exclusively in Telugu literature and it cannot be said that he was not qualified when a person who possessed a degree in Oriental Language in Telugu was qualified – Respondent possesses BA with History, Economics and Political Science and B.Ed. with Telugu and Social Studies as methodology subjects – He also possesses BA in Telugu literature as a single subject from Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University – Degree issued by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University was considered to be equivalent to any other degree in respect of a selection conducted in year 2003 – If Government has considered degree issued by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University as equivalent to any other degree for DSC-2003 and permitted appointment of similarly situated persons, there is no reason why Respondent can be said to be ineligible – There is nothing in Rules which makes a degree issued by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University which is recognised by University Grants Commission (UGC) from being considered as equivalent to any other degree – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 6 to 8)

       Facts of Case:

       Appellants were directed by Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad to consider Respondent for appointment to post of Language Pandit (Telugu) Grade-II. High Court confirmed said direction by dismissing Writ Petition filed by Appellants. Appellants have filed this Appeal challenging correctness of judgment of High Court.

       Findings of Court:

       Respondent possesses BA with History, Economics and Political Science and B.Ed. with Telugu and Social Studies as methodology subjects. He also possesses BA in Telugu literature as a single subject from Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University. If the Government has considered degree issued by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University as equivalent to any other degree for DSC-2003 and permitted appointment of similarly situated persons, there is no reason why Respondent can be said to be ineligible. There is nothing in Rules which makes a degree issued by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University which is recognised by University Grants Commission (UGC) from being considered as equivalent to any other degree.

       Result : Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.

Leave granted.

The Appellants were directed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) to consider the Respondent for appointment to the post of Language Pandit (Telugu) Grade-II. The High Court confirmed the said direction by dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the Appellants. The Appellants have filed this Appeal challenging the correctness of the judgment of the High Court.

2. The Appellant-State issued a notification for recruitment of teachers in Government schools. The Respondent applied for the post of Language Pandit (Telugu). He participated in the selection process and secured rank No.1195. His name was included in the provisional selection list of Language Pandit (Telugu) Grade-II under the B.C. (E) quota for East Godavari District. There were five posts earmarked for B.C.(E) category. The Respondent was one of two candidates selected in the said category. As the Respondent was not selected and appointed, he approached the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal by filing O.A. No.10250 of 2012. An interim order was passed by the Tribunal on 26.12.2012 by which the Appellants were directed to consider the case of the Respondent for appointment as Language Pandit (Telugu).

3. The Respondent passed BA with History, Economics and Political Science in the year 1998 and B.Ed. with Telugu and Social Studies as methodology subjects in the year 2005. He also passed BA in Telugu literature as a single subject from Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University, Hyderabad in the year 2007. He also completed MA in Telugu in distance mode from Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University in the year 2013. The Appellants contended before the Tribunal that the Respondent was not eligible for appointment as he did not possess the requisite educational qualifications. The Appellants relied upon the Andhra Pradesh Direct Recruitment for the post of Teachers (Scheme of Selection) Rules, 2012. According to Rule 4 (2) (iii) (a) of the said Rules, the qualification prescribed for the post of Language Pandit (Telugu) is as follows:-

“Must possess a Bachelor’s Degree with Telugu as the main subject or one of the three equal optional subjects or Bachelor’s Degree in Oriental Language in Telugu (BOL) or its equivalent or a Post Graduate Degree in Telugu and B.Ed with Telugu as methodology or Telugu Pandit Training or its equivalent.”

4. The Tribunal held that the Respondent possessed B.Ed. degree with Telugu and Social Studies as methodology subjects and BA in Telugu literature as single subject from Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University. According to the Tribunal, the Respondent was eligible for being considered for appointment as Language Pandit (Telugu) as the Rules did not disqualify a degree from Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University. On the basis of the said findings, the Tribunal directed the Appellants to consider the case of the Respondent for appointment to the post of Language Pandit (Telugu) Grade-II.

5. The Appellants challenged the judgment of the Tribunal by filing a Writ Petition which was dismissed by the High Court by its judgment dated 22.04.2016. The High Court approved the judgment of the Tribunal on the ground that the Respondent possessed a degree exclusively in Telugu literature and it cannot be said that he was not qualified when a person who possessed a degree in Oriental Language in Telugu was qualified. The High Court also found fault with the Government in not seeking the opinion of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University whilst determining the equivalence of the degree granted by it. The High Court also held that the Tribunal had correctly interpreted the Rules. The correctness of the judgment of the High Court is assailed in this appeal.

6. The appointment to the post of Language Pandit (Telugu) is governed by the Andhra Pradesh Direct Recruitment for the post of Teachers (Scheme of Selection) Rules, 2012. Rule 4(2) (iii) (a) contemplates that the educational


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top