SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 276

J.CHELAMESWAR, A.M.SAPRE
Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Chelameswar, J.

1. These three appeals are factually interconnected and also raise a common question of law.

2. The appellants in Civil Appeal No.7823/2014 M/s. Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd. originally owned three (3) industrial units (Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills) located in the State of Karnataka. Subsequently, two of those units came to be acquired by the appellants in the other two appeals in this batch. Further details of the acquisition may not be relevant for the purpose of this judgment.

3. The production activity carried on by the three industrial units of these appellants is subject to levy of excise duty under the Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 (hereafter ‘THE ACT’). Section 3 [Section 3 insofar as it is relevant for the purpose of this judgment read at the relevant point of time:-

“Section 3. Duties specified in the First Schedule and the Second Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 to be levied.-

(1) There shall be levied and collected in such manner as may be prescribed,-

(a) a duty of excise on all excisable goods which are produced or manufactured in India as, and at the rates, set forth in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985;”] o













































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top