SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 371

DIPAK MISRA, A.K.SIKRI, AMITAVA ROY, A.M.KHANWILKAR, MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR
KARMANYA SINGH SAREEN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Harish N. Salve, learned senior counsel along with Ms. Madhavi Divan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General, Mr. Tushar Mehta and Mr. P.S. Narasimha, learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India, Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel for the respondent No.2, WhatsApp Inc., Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned senior counsel for the respondent No.3, Facebook Inc., and Mr. Sanjay Kapur, learned counsel for the respondent No.5.

2. At the commencement of the hearing, after giving some introduction with regard to the functioning of the internet, Mr. Harish N. Salve, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the respondent No.5 and the counter affidavit that has been filed by the Union of India, the respondent No.1. At this juncture, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General for India has submitted that the stand of the Union of India is that there is going to be a regulatory regime to save the data base to guide the concept of net-neutrality.

3. On being questioned, what are the real issues involved, before Mr. S



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top