SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 380

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dipak Misra, A.M.Khanwilkar, JJ.
State of Kerala & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
M/s. Palakkad Heritage Hotels – Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5204 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.35461 of 2014)
Decided On : 13-04-2017

IMPORTANT POINT
Even though processing of case commences from date of application, the relevant date would be the date on which the competent authority takes the formal and final decision, and recommendation made by subordinate authority not relevant.

Headnote:Administration of justice – Applicable rules – Processing of case commences from date of application – Relevant date would be the date on which the competent authority takes the formal and final decision – Recommendation made by subordinate authority not relevant. (Para 11)

       AIR 2016 SC 163; (2010) 5 SCC 186 – Referred

       Facts of the case:

       The respondent, a heritage hotel, applied for licence for foreign liquor. Its application was recommended by the Commissioner excise.

       During the pendency of the said application the rules were changed/ amended.

       The respondent’s application was rejected in view of the changed/amended rules.

       The High Court allowed the writ petition thereagainst.

       Finding of the Court:

       Even though processing of case commences from date of application, the relevant date would be the date on which the competent authority takes the formal and final decision, and recommendation made by subordinate authority not relevant.

JUDGMENT

A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.

1. The Respondent constructed a hotel which has been classified as Heritage (Basic) Category for five years (w.e.f. 1st March, 2012 till 28th February, 2017). The Respondent submitted an application for grant of a Beer/Wine Bar FL-11 Licence under the Foreign Liquor Rules. That application was processed by the Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Palakkad. On the basis of the report submitted by the said authority, the Excise Commissioner of Thiruvananthapuram forwarded his recommendation to the Secretary to Government Taxes Department, Government of Kerala, vide a letter dated 28th March, 2012. The Excise Commissioner duly recommended grant of sanction for FL-11 License to the Respondent as per the rules. While the said recommendation was pending consideration before the State Government, the Foreign Liquor Rules came to be amended on 18th April, 2012. The amendment inter alia prescribes the minimum distance of 200 metres from an objectionable institution. The report submitted by the Deputy Commissioner of Excise records the distance between the gate of the hotel of the Respondent and the nearest objectionable institution (being Sree Bhagwati Ayappa Temple, Karuvannurthara) as 70 metres only. Consequent to the amendment to the Foreign Liquor Rules, the Government vide letter No. 8028/A2/2012/TD dated 26th April, 2012, called upon the Excise Commissioner, Thiruvananthapuram to examine the proposal of the Respondent. The Excise Commissioner, by a speaking order passed on 5th June, 2012, came to the conclusion that the application submitted by the Respondent deserved to be rejected and directed it to be returned to the Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Palakkad.

2. For answering the controversy at hand, we deem it apposite to reproduce the said communication in its entirety:

“PROCEEDINGS OF THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER,

KERALA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (Present: Sri. A. Ajith Kumar IAS)

Sub:- Excise-Abkari-Application for FL-11 licence to Palkkad Heritage Hotels, Koduvayoor, Palakkad rejected –orders issued.

Read:- (1) Govt. Letter No. 8028/A2/2012/TD dated 26/04/2012

(2) Letter No. CZ3-577/12 dated 19.03.2012 of the Joint Excise Commissioner, Central Zone, Ernakulam.

(3) Letter No. P-6-1611/12 dated 16/03/12 & 21/03/2012 of Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Palakkad.

(4) Application dated 01/03/2012 of Sri. M.J. Thomas

(5) GO (Ms) No. 107/11/TD dated 17/08/11

(6) GO (P) No. 72/2012/TD dated 18/04/12

ORDER NO. XC6-7476/12/K. Dis Dated 05.06.2012

The Joint Excise Commissioner, Central Zone, Ernakulam has forwarded, vide letter read as 1st above, an application submitted by Sri. M. J. Thomas, Managing Partner, M/s Palakad Heritage Hotels, Eroor P.O. Ernakulam requesting sanction for FL-11 licence in his name to the Palakkad Heritage Hotels, Koduvayoor, Palakkad having a valid heritage basic category classification certificate vide order No. 27/HRACC (08)/2011 dated 09.03.2012 of the Member Secretary (HRACC) Ministry of Tourism, Government of India, Chennai. The hotel is situated in Re. Sy. No. 673/8-1 Koduvayoor Village in Chittur Taluk bearing door No. XI/324 of Koduvayoor Grama Panchayat in Palakkad District.

The Deputy Commisisoner of Excise, Palakkad has reported that the nearest objectionable institution is the Sree Bhagavathy Ayyappa Temple, Karuvannurthara which is 70 meters away from the gate of the hotel.

Before the amendment made vide Government order read as 6th above, as per rule 13 (3) of Forensic Liquor Rules, there was a restriction that no FL-3 licence shall be issued to hotels which are located within 200 meters from objectionable site (educational institution, temple, church, mosque or burial ground, schedule caste/schedule tribe colony ) but those hotels other than in the private sector having four, five star, five star deluxe classification will be exempted from the distance restrictions in the interest of promotion of tourism and also in the case of hotels in private sector of above categories and hotels hav











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top