ORDER

G.S. Singhvi and H.L. Dattu, JJ. - This petition is directed against the order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short “the National Commission”) whereby the revision filed by the petitioner against the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission was dismissed. The petitioner has also filed an application for condonation of 233 days’ delay.

2. We have heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and carefully perused the record.

3. The explanation given by the petitioner for delayed filing of the special leave petition is contained in Paras 4 to 7 of IA No. 1 of 2011. The same read as under:

“4. That the petitioner was in Kuwait with her husband and school-going children. That the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission passed its order on 23-8-2010. The counsel of the applicant informed the applicant about the order of the National Commission about a fortnight of passing of the order. The applicant after a thorough and careful consideration along with her husband decided to bring the matter before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The applicant thus on 20-11-2010 instructed her counsel from Kuwait to dra