SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 538

KURIAN JOSEPH, R.BANUMATHI
NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI & ORS. ETC. ETC. – Appellant
Versus
AFSHAN KHAN AND ORS ETC. ETC. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Kurian, J.

Issue notice.

2. Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned counsel, appears and waives notice for all the respondents on behalf of Ms. Rakhi Ray, Advocate-on-Record.

3. Leave granted.

4. With the consent of the learned Solicitor General of India appearing for the appellants and Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, these appeals are disposed of at the admission stage.

5. The appellants are before this Court, aggrieved by the interim order passed by the High Court in effect directs of reinstatement of the respondents during the pendency of these appeals.

6. In the background of the case including the order passed by this Court in C.A. No.4416 of 2016, we are of the view that the High Court could not have granted interim order for reinstatement.

7. Therefore, these appeals are disposed of as follows:-

i. We request the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Jabalpur to dispose of Writ Petition No.19101 of 2016 and connected matters expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment.

ii. Till the order is passed by the High Court in the writ petition as above, the respondents are no


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top