SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 601

A.K.SIKRI, R.K.AGRAWAL
TARUN TYAGI – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.K. SIKRI, J.

On the basis of a complaint lodged by one Mr Alok Gupta, Director of M/s Unistal Systems (P) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the complainant”), a first information report (FIR) was registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 23-7-2007 wherein the appellant was made an accused. In the said FIR, the complainant had alleged that on or around 11-3-2005, the appellant had stolen the “source code” of a software known as “Quick Recovery” developed by the complainant's company and thereafter put it for sale on the website of the appellant company under the name “Prodatadoctor”. A case was registered under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 63 and 63-B read with Section 14(b)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. CBI took up the investigation and seized certain documents and material from the office/residential premises of the appellant after conducting search and seizure on 3-8-2007. The appellant moved, sometime in January 2008, an application seeking release of the seized property. This application was rejected by the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi on 3-3-2008. The High Court of Delhi s






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top