SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 626

N.V.RAMANA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
Santosh Kumar Kurre – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Dr. Rajesh Pandey, Nitin Bhardwaj, B.K. Singh, Yogita Anusha, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Bansuri Swaraj, Prateek Rusia, C.D. Singh, Advocates.

ORDER

1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length.

2. Leave granted.

3. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 3.4.2017 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in M.Cr.C No. 1816 of 2017, whereby the High Court dismissed the bail application, which was filed by the appellant herein.

4. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to grant regular bail to the appellant to the satisfaction of the trial Court, on such terms and conditions as may be considered appropriate by the trial Court, in the facts and circumstances of the case. Ordered accordingly.

5. If, in any event, the appellant tries to influence any of the witnesses or interferes in the process of investigation, the State is at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail before the trial Court.

The appeal is, accordingly, allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top