SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 628

DIPAK MISRA, RANJAN GOGOI, A.K.SIKRI
S. E. B. I. – Appellant
Versus
SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:Arvind P. Datar, Shekhar Napahade, Sr. Advocate (A.C.), Shubhangi Tuli, Vikram Sabbi, Pratap Venugopal, Niharika, Kanika Kalayarasan, Aman Shukla, Purushottam Kumar ha, (for M/s. K.J. John & Co.), Advocates.
For the Respondents:Kapil Sibal, Salman Khurshid, Mukul Rohatgi, Biswajeet Bhattachary, Ratnakar Dash, Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocates, Maninder Singh, Tushar Mehta, ASG, Gautam Awasthi, Ayush Choudhary, Tushar Gupta, Simaranjeet Singh, Rahul Tripathi, Gautam Talukdar Zafar Khurshid, Ram Sajan Yadav, Vijay Kumar, Geetanjali Kapur, Nizam Pasha, Sakshi Katiyal, Gautam Awasthi, A. Chaudhary, Devanshi Singh, Prashant Kumar, Prashant Kumar, M.R. Ramesh Babu, Swati Setia, Rana Mukherjee, D.L. Chidananda, A.K. Srivastava, Sadhana Sandhu, Sushma Manchanda, Nalini Kohli, B.K. Prasad, Anil Katiyar, Rakesh Kr. Sharma, Amit Anand Tiwari, Yash Pal Dhingra, P.N. Puri, Pawan Upadhyay, S. Pratap Singh, Sharmila Upadhyay, C.K. Sasi, K. Mayil Samy, K.P. Narayanan, Ram Sankar, P. Soma Sundaram, G. Sivabalamurugan, Vandana Sehgal, Ankur S. Kulkarni, Anupam Lal Das, Prashant Choudhary, Sanjeev Agarwal, Mohit D. Ram, Vishwa Pal Singh, Shally Bhasin, Kaushik Anand Satpathy, Vidhi Goel, Hemantika Wahi, Shodhika Sharma, Ajay Chokshi, B.A.S. Jadon, S. Qureshi, R. Haini, Rabin Majumdar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. On 19.6.2017, after noting prayers in I.A. No.47681 of 2017, the following order was passed:

"Be it noted, on the previous occasion, i.e. 27th April, 2017, the contemnor had furnished two post-dated cheques, one dated 15th June, 2017, for Rs. 1500,00,00,000/- (Rupees fifteen hundred crores only) and the second one dated 15th July, 2017, for a sum of Rs. 552,21,00,000/- (Rupees five hundred fifty-two crores and twenty-one lakhs only). An assurance was given by Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as by the contemnor, who was present in the Court, that the cheques shall be honoured. It was directed that if there will be a failure, the contemnor may be sent to custody. It is submitted by Mr. Sibal relying on the application filed by the contemnor that till today they have deposited Rs. 774 crores in SEBI Sahara Refund Account and today he has handed over eighteen demand drafts amounting to Rs. 16,11,95,000/- (Rupees sixteen crores eleven lakhs and ninety-five thousand) in favour of SEBI Sahara Refund Account. The total amount that has been deposited in SEBI Sahara Refund Account comes to Rs. 790.18 crores. Thus, the balance sum to be













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top