SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 633

RANJAN GOGOI, NAVIN SINHA
Kala Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Aditya Singh, Mr. Vikas Verma, Mr. Naveen Gupta

ORDER :

1. Despite service is complete on the respondents, no one appears for them. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and considered the matter.

2. Leave granted.

3. After going into all the materials placed and the grievance expressed, we are inclined to consider the claim of the appellant. Therefore, we direct that in the event of arrest of the appellant in connection with FIR No.221 dated 1st November, 2016 registered at P.S. Patran, District Patiala, Punjab, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority. The accused appellant shall cooperate with the investigation at all further stages as may be required and in the event there is any failure on the part of the appellant to so cooperate, it will be open for the prosecution to seek cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by the present order. We also make it clear that it will be open to the Arresting Authority to impose such conditions as may be considered fit and appropriate.

4. The Arresting Authority is free to impose appropriate conditions as he deems fit.

5. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top