SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 689

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Neeraj Kumar Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :- Ms. S. Janani, Adv.
For the Respondents:- Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.

Leave granted.

This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 25th February, 2015 in Neeraj Kumar Rai and ors. v. State of U.P. and ors, 2015(2) ADJ 795, 2015(4)ALJ 94.

2. The High Court repelled the challenge to the validity of notification dated 29th July, 2011 issued by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) under Section 23 (1) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE). The challenge was raised on the ground of arbitrariness leading to violation of Article 14. Under the impugned notification, requirement of 50% marks in graduation was made mandatory apart from other qualifications for appointment of teachers in schools. The said requirement was not mandatory earlier for those who had 50% marks in post graduation at the time when they took admission to the B.Ed., which was also the relevant qualification for appointment as teacher in terms of notification dated 23rd August, 2010 under Section 23 of the RTE. Further contention of the appellants was that even according to the NCTE those who had 50% marks in post graduation, and were eligible for admission to B.Ed. on that b












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top