SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 776

R.K.AGRAWAL, A.M.SAPRE
Ajayinder Sangwan – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Raj Kumar Sharma, S.K. Sharma, S.N. Sharma, Arun Rathi, Gaurav Chandhok, Tarunesh Kumar, Dushyant Yadav, Deepak Sehrawat, Rishina Parasher, Narendra Singh, Rohan Sharma, Irfan Firdous, V.P. Singh, Sanjay Verma, Kunal Chopra, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Dhan Singh, Lalit Kumar, Karuna Nidhar Rawal, B.N. Sharma, Anirudha Kumar, C.P. Singh, Sanjay Singh, Manoj Panchal, Shibashish Misra, Sylona Mohapatra, Ms. Sweet Chattopadhyaya, Santosh Singh, Sidharth Mahajan, Rajeev Kumar Jha, Vivek Narayan Sharma, Ms. K.R. Chitra, (Petitioner-in-person), Ms. Sarla Chandra, Sriram P., Athira G. Nair, Ankur S. Kulkarni, Anil Kumar Gupta-II, S. Prabakaran, Sr. Adv., Ram Sankar, G. Ananda Selvam, V. Senthil Kumar, Y. Lokesh, Surya Narayanan, P. Jegan, Rajaram Narayanan, R.V. Kameshwaran, Mayilsamy K., K.P. Narayanan, K. Muthu Ramesh Pardian, Arun Singh, Nihangam Maurya, P. Soma Sundaram, H.N. Nagamohandas, Anantha Narayana M.G., Satya Mitra, (M/s. Parekh & Co.), Vidit Monga, Vikas Upadhyay, Advs.
For the Respondents: Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Ms. Gunwant Dass, M.K. Maroria, Manan Kumar Mishra, Sr. Adv., S. Prabhakaran, Sr. Adv., Apurb Kumar Sharma, Sr. Adv., Nirmal Kumar Ambastha, Nitesh Ranjan, Ms. Ansul Dwivedi, Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Ms. Sarla Chandra, Pranay Negi, Ms. Khushboo Khan, Praveen Agrawal, Ananta Prasad Mishra, Gagan Gupta, H. Chandra Sekhar, Ashwani Kumar Dubey, Prabhakar Parnam, Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Ms. Nandini Gore, Parmanand Pandey, Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Poli Kataki, Col. R. Balasubramanium, Prateek Bhatia, Gaurav Sharma, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya, Ms. Fauzia Shakil, Ujjwal Singh, Mojahid Karim Khan, M. Shoeb Alam, Prang Neomai, Mohinder Jit Singh, E.C. Agrawala, Himinder Lal, Shibashish Misra, Amitesh Kumar, Shashank S. Singh, Ms. Priti Kumari, Ms. Babita Kushwaha, Mritunjay Kumar Sinha, Subhasish Mohanty, Mohammed Sadique T.A., Amol B. Karande, Gopal Prasad, Anupam Lal Das, P. Venkat Reddy, Prashant Tyagi, (M/s. Venkat Palwai Law Associates), Ms. Sneha Kalita, Vikas Upadhyay, Ms. Aparna Jha, Kailash Chand, Ms. Beena Victor, Ravi Ramad, Miranda Solamon, Jogy Scaria, Rakesh K. Sharma, Ms. Sonam Sharma, Bhavya Tandon, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Deepak Goel, Aditya Singh, Pijush K. Roy, Mrs. Kakali Roy, Rajan K. Chourasia, Abhishek Swarup, Ms. Lalita Kohli, (M/s. Manoj Swarup And Co.), Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, Kishore Lambat, Ms. Manju Jetley, Mrs. Santosh Singh, Ms. Malini Poduval, Aditya Sharma, Akash Jindal, Tanuj Agarwal, (M/s. Parekh & Co.), Anurag Dubey, S. R. Setia, Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, Y. Raja Gopala Rao, Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Kunal Chatterji, Rajeev Singh, Anjani Kumar Mishra, Christi Jain, Harvinder Chowdhury, Suhas Kadam, (M/s Lemax Lawyers & Co.), Vishal Khattar, Ms. C. Rubavathi, V. Senthil Kumar, M.A. Chinnasamy, P.V. Dinesh, Buddy A. Ranganadhan, A. V. Rangam, Sunil Fernandes, Ms. Deepali S. Surana, Ms. Sugandha Jain, Dr. Harsh V. Surana, S.N. Pandey, (Intervener-in-person) Pawan Kumar Shukla, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Manindra Dubey, Atul Jha, Sandeep Jha, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Ms. Bina Madhavan, Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Mrityunjai Singh, Ms. Swati Bhardwaj, Piyush Dwivedi, Prateek Dhir, Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Mrs. Elizabeth Antony, (M/s. Lawyer's Knit & Co.), Ms. Kasturika Kaumudi, Ms. Daisy Hannah, Ms. Ekta Pradhan, Shekhar Kumar, Sabarish Subramanian, M. Velmurugan, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv., Amit Sharma, G.S. Makkar, Advs.

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, J.

The present transferred case has originated owing to the steps taken by the Bar Council of India to cause an enquiry and to find out fake lawyers out of its members and/or not even a member of the Bar Councils and/or member of any Bar Association of the country. While countering, Bar Council of India has submitted that steps have been taken in the matter in accordance with the Advocates Act, 1961 and the Rules framed thereunder to come to a conclusion and to find out such number of fake lawyers in the country and only thereafter the elections to the State Bar Councils can be held.

2. This Court, vide order dated 05.10.2015, directed that all the matters which are pending in different High Courts in connection with the matter in question be transferred to this court for hearing while refusing to grant stay in respect of giving effect to the Notification in connection with the Bar Council of India Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015.

3. Further, in pursuance thereto, this court, vide order dated 02.11.2015, directed that the persons who are not members of the Bar Association of any State or District or otherwise to carry on their profession

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top