SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 782

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Madan B. Lokur, Deepak Gupta, JJ.
Nipun Saxena & Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petitions(Civil) Nos. 565 of 2012
Decided On : 25-08-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Ms. Indira Jaising, Sr. Adv. (A.C.), (Petitioner-in-person), Aditya Arora, Namit Saxena, Ms. Radhika Saxena, Prashant Chaudhary, R.P. Gupta, E.C. Agrawala, Advs.
For the Respondents UOI: Maninder Singh, ASG, A.K. Panda, Sr. Adv., S.A. Habeeb, Ms. Bhakti Pasrija Sethi, B.V. Balaram, Shailender Saini, Gurmeet Singh Makker, B. Krishna Prasad, S. Wasim A. Qadri, J.A. Khan, Zaid Ali, Tamim Qadri, Saeed Qadri, Lakshmi Raman Singh, Ms. Jyotika Kalra, Advs.
For the Chandigarh Administration : Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, Sanveer Mehlwal, Dr. Ravindra Chingle, For States of Andhra Pradesh : Guntur Prabhakar, Ms. Prerna Singh, Advs.
For the Assam : Debojit Borkakati, Ms. Diksha Rai, (M/s. Corporate Law Group), Adv.
For the Bihar : Gopal Singh, Adv.
For the Chhattisgarh : A.P. Mayee, Adv.
For the Goa : Shishir Deshpande, Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Anurag Sharma, Advs.
For the Gujarat : Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv.
For the H.P. : D.K. Thakur, AAG.
For the Haryana : Ajay Bansal, AAG, Vishwa Pal Singh, Gaurav Yadava, Sanjay Kr. Visen, Advs.
For the J&K : Sunil Fernandes, Adv.
For the Jharkhand : Tapesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Karnataka : V.N. Raghupathy, Adv.
For the Kerala : C.K. Sasi, Adv.
For the M.P. : Mishra Saurabh, Ankit Kr. Lal, Ms. Vanshuja Shukla, Advs.
For the Maharashtra : Ms. Madhavi Divan, Nishant Katneshwarkar, Advs.
For the Manipur : Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv.
For the Meghalaya : Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv.
For the Mizoram : T.G. Narayanan Nair, Adv.
For the Nagaland : Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, Edward Belho, Amit Kumar Singh, K. Luikang Michael, Advs.
For the Odisha : Shibashish Misra, Adv.
For the Punjab : Karan Bharihoke, Ms. Zehra Khan, Advs.
For the Rajasthan : S.S. Shamshery, Amit Sharma, Ankit Raj, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Nalin Kohli, AAG, Ankit Roy, Indrajeet Singh, Ms. Vishakha Ahuja, Milind Kumar, Advs.
For the Sikkim : Ms. Aruna Mathur, Avneesh Arputham, Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Amit Arora, Ms. Simran Jeet for (M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.), Adv.
For the Tamil Nadu : M. Yogesh Kanna, Ms. Mahalakshmi, Ms. Sujatha B., Advs.
For the Telangana : S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Mrityunjai Singh, For (M/s Lawyer's Knit & Co.), Adv.
For the Tripura : Gopal Singh, Adv.
For the Uttar Pradesh : Sanjay Tyagi, Upendra Mishra, Vinay Garg, Abhisth Kumar, Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Advs.
For the Uttarakhand : Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Adv.
For the West Bengal : C.K. Ganguli, Adv.
For the A&N Islands : K.V. Jagdishvaran, Mrs. G. Indira, Advs.
For the Puducherry : V.G. Pragasam, Prabu Ramasubramanian, Manu Sundaram, Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Arun K. Sinha, G.N. Reddy, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Mrs. Asha Gopalan Nair, B. Balaji, Advs.

Headnote:Victim compensation scheme – Rape victim and new born baby – Need medical care, good diet and rehabilitation – Father of victim wishing new born to be given in adoption – He also requesting confidentiality of identity – Directions given. (Para 6, 8, 9, 13)

ORDER

We have heard learned Amicus, the learned Additional Solicitor General, learned counsel for Chandigarh Administration as well as Mr. Alok Agarwal, Member Secretary, NALSA and Mr. Mahavir Singh, Member Secretary, State Legal Services Authority, U.T, Chandigarh.

2. We have also gone through the report prepared by Shri Mahavir Singh, Member Secretary, State Legal Services Authority, U.T. Chandigarh pursuant to our order dated 22.08.2017.

3. The report details the status relating to the health and physical condition of the rape victim and her new born baby. It also details the wishes of the parents of the victim and rehabilitation of the victim and new born baby. Finally, the report also contains status regarding investigation of the criminal case. As far as investigation of criminal case is concerned, it is stated that challan has been filed in an appropriate court on 24.08.2017. We are sure that the court will take necessary steps in the matter.

4. As far as the wishes of the parents of the victim are concerned, it is stated that they would like the new born baby to be adopted and it appears that steps have already been taken to declare the child free for adoption. It is further stated that since the victim and the new born baby is likely to be discharged from the hospital in a few days, medicines and special diet will be required to be provided for.

5. As far as the victim is concerned, it appears that she may require a special diet for the next six months. In addition to the above, steps are required to be taken for rehabilitation of the victim for which the assistance of a support person and counselling are necessary.

6. As far as provision for a support person, counselling, special diet and medical facilities for the victim and medical facilities for the new born baby are concerned, we direct the Chandigarh Administration to make adequate provision for this through the Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh. The Social Welfare Department of the Chandigarh Administration will ensure that no difficulty is faced by the victim or the new born baby in this regard.

7. We make it clear that the facilities will be provided free of charge so far as the victim and the new born baby are concerned.

8. While the father of the victim has not given any indication of any compensation, we are of the view that since a special diet is necessary for the victim and for the new born baby, an amount of Rs. 1 lac should be released immediately by the State Legal Services Authority, U.T. Chandigarh so that the immediate financial needs can be taken care of. We make it clear that the father of the victim can approach the State Legal Services Authority if there is any further requirement in this regard.

9. Under the Victim Compensation Scheme for the Chandigarh Administration, it appears that an amount of Rs. 10 lacs is the entitlement of the victim. Therefore, the balance amount of Rs. 9 lacs may be kept in a fixed deposit for the time being. If the father of the victim requires some more financial assistance, the State Legal Services Authority can make use of this amount from the fixed deposit and the interest incurred thereon.

10. Learned Amicus says that in the long term, it may be appropriate if some sort of a trust or a foundation is created or established. She says that she will work on it and give a scheme within a week.

11. Learned Amicus also says that she has been handed over the Victim Compensation Scheme of all States and Union Territories by Mr. Alok Agarwal, Member Secretary, NALSA except Andaman and Nicobar Island. She says that she will give her suggestions so that the best practices available in all these schemes can be compiled and one composite scheme can be prepared. This will take some time.

12. One of the wishes of the father of the victim is that there should be complete confidentiality and secrecy about the parents of the victim as well as about the victim including the place of residence and the place of work.

13. We ma






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top