RANJAN GOGOI, MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR
Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Technical Education Sanstha, Nagpur – Appellant
Versus
Prashant Manikrao Kubitkar – Respondent
ORDER :
Leave granted.
2. The labour Court held the termination of the respondent workman to be in infraction of Sections 25F and 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and awarded reinstatement with continuity in service but without back wages. The approach to the Labour Court was after 13 years of the termination made on 1st June, 1994. The High Court in writ petition filed by the appellant affirmed the said order. Hence the present appeal.
3. The respondent workman had worked under the appellant for a period of two years and three months whereafer he was terminated on 1st June, 1994. Judicial opinion has been consistent that if the termination is found to be contrary to Sections 25F and 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 reinstatement in service is not the rule but an exception and ordinarily grant of compensation would meet the ends of justice.
4. The respondent workman in the present case had worked for a period of two years and three months and that apart he had approached the labour Court after 13 years. Taking into account the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case we are of the view that the order of the labour Court and the High Court ought to be modified
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.