SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 979

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.ABDUL NAZEER
SHYAM SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.

1. The appellant-Shyam Sharma has called in question the legality and correctness of the judgment in Criminal Appeal No.190 of 1999, dated 19th January, 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench at Gwalior whereby the judgment dated 31.3.1999 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gwalior, in Sessions Trial No. 379/1996 has been affirmed.

2. The Appellant-Shyam Sharma was convicted by the Sessions Judge, under Section 307 IPC and was sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.1,000/-and in the event of default in payment of fine, he was directed to further undergo additional imprisonment of five months.

3. The contention of Mr. V. Giri, learned senior counsel, appearing for the appellant, is that the independent witnesses Anoop Bhargava (PW-1) and Ramprakash (PW-4) did not support the prosecution case. Manjeet Singh (PW-3) is an interested witness. The appellant is a computer engineer and has no criminal background. At the most, the appellant can be convicted under Section 324 of the IPC. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has supported the judgment of the High



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top