SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 991

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Madan B. Lokur, Deepak Gupta, JJ.
M.K. Balakrishnan & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 230 of 2001
Decided On : 03-04-2017

Proper functioning of regulatory authorities and the role of High Courts in monitoring international heritage sites.

Headnote:

Central Wetland Regulatory Authority - Establishment and Functioning - The court directed the Union of India to ensure the nomination of officers to the Central Wetland Regulatory Authority and to provide detailed information on the expenditure incurred for wetland conservation. The court also directed the concerned High Courts to monitor the management of Ramsar Convention sites within their jurisdiction.

Fact of the Case:

The Union of India informed the court about the constitution of the Central Wetland Regulatory Authority and the expenditure incurred for wetland conservation. The court expressed concerns about the lack of visible improvement and the general nature of activities undertaken.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the Union of India to nominate officers to the Central Wetland Regulatory Authority, provide detailed expenditure information, and requested the concerned High Courts to monitor the management of Ramsar Convention sites within their jurisdiction.

Issues: Nomination of officers to the Central Wetland Regulatory Authority, expenditure for wetland conservation, and management of Ramsar Convention sites.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for proper functioning of the Central Wetland Regulatory Authority and the monitoring of Ramsar Convention sites by the concerned High Courts.

Final Decision: The Union of India was directed to file an affidavit regarding the nomination of officers and expenditure within six weeks, and the matter was listed for further hearing on 12th July, 2017.

ORDER

Pursuant to our last order dated 8th February, 2017, it has been brought to our notice by learned counsel appearing for Union of India that Central Wetland Regulatory Authority (CWRA) has since been constituted on 14th February, 2017. The Ministry of Tourism and the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment have not nominated an officer not below the rank of Joint Secretary to the Authority. We expect these two Ministries to make the nominations at the earliest so that the Central Wetland Regulatory Authority can comprehensively carry on its mandate under the law.

2. We have also been shown a statement of expenditure that has been filed by the Union of India along with an affidavit dated 28th March, 2017. While huge amounts appear to have been spent to the extent of Rs.945.95 crores, it appears from a reading of the affidavit that not much improvement seems to have been made at least on the ground. That apart, the activities or the steps undertaken and the expenditure incurred in respect of those activities are extremely general in nature. We are also not sure whether the accounts have been audited or not.

3. Learned counsel for the Union of India says that he will ascertain whether the accounts of the amounts that have been disbursed to the State Governments have been audited and file an affidavit in this regard.

4. We have put it to learned counsel for the petitioner that insofar as the Ramsar Convention sites are concerned, since they are matters of international heritage, it might be more appropriate if the concerned High Courts monitor the management of these sites at least till there is some visible improvement. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that he has no objection to this.

5. Under the circumstances, we direct the Registry of this Court to make photocopies of the affidavit filed by the Union of India by Dr. A. Duraisamy, Scientist 'F' and Member Secretary, Central Wetland Regulatory Authority and send it to the following High Courts:

High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, Gauhati High Court, Gujarat High Court, Himachal Pradesh High Court, J&K High Court, Kerala High Court, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Manipur High Court, Orissa High Court, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Rajasthan High Court, Madras High Court, Tripura High Court, Allahabad High Court and High Court at Calcutta.

6. The affidavit be sent to the Registrar General of all the aforementioned High Courts within two weeks from today. A copy of all the orders passed by this Court from 10th September, 2014 till today shall also be sent to the concerned High Courts along with the affidavit.

7. We request Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court to treat the affidavit as a suo motu public interest petition and, if necessary, appoint an amicus to assist the court so as to ensure that the Ramsar Convention sites within their jurisdiction are properly maintained.

8. The affidavit by the Union of India should be filed within six weeks. List the matter on 12th July, 2017.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top