SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1027

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, JJ.
Atma Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurmej Kaur (D) & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 11094 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22154 of 2012)
Decided On : 13-09-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :- Surabhi Aggarwal, Ambreesh Kumar Aggarwal, Advocates.
For the Respondents:- Jasmine Damkewala, Ms. Nidhi, Advocates.

The widow's right to inherit ceases on remarriage, but it does not affect her right to inherit the estate of her son.

Headnote:

Hindu Widow's Re-Marriage Act, 1856 - The Act was enacted to remove legal obstacles to the marriage of Hindu widows and to render re-marriage valid. Section 2 of the Act provides that the rights and interests of a widow in her deceased husband's property cease on her re-marriage. Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - The Act governs the succession of property among Hindus. Section 4 of the Act gives the Act an overriding effect over any other law in force before its commencement. Section 8 of the Act provides for the general rules of succession in the case of males. The mother is described as a Class I heir in the Schedule to the Act. The court held that the widow's right to inherit ceases on remarriage, but it does not affect her right to inherit the estate of her son.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed a suit for a declaration that he is the owner and in joint possession of the half share of the land owned by Pal Singh. The Trial Court dismissed the suit, and the High Court affirmed the decision, holding that the appellant's mother, Gurmej Kaur, being the real mother of Pal Singh, shall succeed to his estate. The appellant argued that Gurmej Kaur loses her right to inherit the property due to her remarriage. The court analyzed the provisions of the Hindu Widow's Re-Marriage Act, 1856 and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and held that the widow's right to inherit ceases on remarriage, but it does not affect her right to inherit the estate of her son. The court also referred to the judgment in Smt. Kasturi Devi v. Deputy Director of Consolidation and others, (1976) 4 SCC 674, which held that a mother cannot be divested of her interest in her son's property on the ground of remarriage. The court concluded that the appellant's mother was rightly held to succeed the properties of Pal Singh, and dismissed the appeal.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the provisions of the Hindu Widow's Re-Marriage Act, 1856 and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and held that the widow's right to inherit ceases on remarriage, but it does not affect her right to inherit the estate of her son. The court also referred to the judgment in Smt. Kasturi Devi v. Deputy Director of Consolidation and others, (1976) 4 SCC 674, which held that a mother cannot be divested of her interest in her son's property on the ground of remarriage.

Ratio Decidendi: The widow's right to inherit ceases on remarriage, but it does not affect her right to inherit the estate of her son.

Result: The suit filed by the plaintiff has been correctly dismissed by all the Courts below.

JUDGMENT

Ashok Bhushan, J.

This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court dated 14.07.2009 by which the High Court has dismissed the Regular Second Appeal filed by the appellant.

2. The facts of the case are not in dispute and lie in a very narrow compass. The appellant has filed Civil Suit No. 220 of 2001 for a declaration that the plaintiff is the owner and in joint possession of the half share of the land owned by Pal Singh deceased son of Narain Singh. Narain Singh had three sons namely Atma Singh, the appellant, Mohan Singh, respondent No.5 and Pal Singh. The defendant No.1, Gurmej Kaur was wife of Narain Singh. Narain Singh, who was the owner of land in dispute died in the year 1952 intestate. He left behind his above three sons and wife Gurmej Kaur. Gurmej Kaur immediately after death of Narain Singh remarried with one Inder Singh. Pal Singh, son of Narain Singh died in the year 1972 intestate. He was not married and so had no children. Estate of Pal Singh was mutated in favour of Gurmej Kaur, his mother. Thereafter, Suit No. 220 of 2001 was filed by the appellant. The Trial Court dismissed the suit holding that defendant No. 1, Gurmej Kaur being the real mother of deceased Pal Singh and she being Class I heir shall succeed to Pal Singh after his death. The appeal was filed by the appellant, which too was dismissed on 07.02.2006, against which second appeal was filed. The High Court in its judgment reaffirmed the decision of Court below. The High Court held that although after death of Narain Singh, Gurmej Kaur, on account of her re-marriage will loose right in estate of Narain Singh but have every right to inherit the estate of her son, Pal Singh in terms of Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The plaintiff appellant aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court have come up in this appeal.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant in support of the appeal contends that after re-marriage, Gurmej Kaur loses her right to inherit the property of Narain Singh as well as his lineal descendants. Hence she was not entitled to inherit the estate of Pal Singh. It is submitted that Courts below did not advert to The Hindu Widow's Re-Marriage Act, 1856, which clearly dis-entitle the defendant No.1 to inherit the estate of Pal Singh. It is submitted that in the year 1972 when Pal Singh died, the Hindu Window's Re-Marriage Act, 1856 was in force and defendant No.1 was not entitled to inherit the property of Narain Singh i.e. property of father of the deceased but was entitled to inherit the estate of Pal Singh.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent refuted the submission of the counsel for the appellant and contended that the provisions of the Hindu Widow's Re-Marriage Act, 1856 are no longer applicable in view of the overriding effect given to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 under Section 4 of the 1956 Act. He submits that the defendant No.1 being natural mother of Pal Singh has rightly been held to inherit his estate under the 1956 Act.

5. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

6. The issue to be considered in the present appeal is as to whether the Hindu Widow's Re-Marriage Act, 1856 dis-entitles the defendant No.1 to inherit the estate of Pal Singh. For answering the aforesaid issue, we need to examine the provisions of the Hindu Widow's Re-Marriage Act, 1856.

7. The Hindu Widow's Re-Marriage Act, 1856 was enacted to remove all legal obstacles to the marriage of the Hindu Widows. The Act was enacted to render re-marriage valid to legalize the legitimacy of the children. It conferred a benefit on those who could not marry but at the same time imposes a restriction on them. Section 2 of the Act on which reliance have been placed is as follows:-

"2 Rights of widow in deceased husband's property to cease on her re-marriage.- All rights and interests which any widow may have in her deceased husband's property by way of maintenance, or by inh



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top