SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.K. AGRAWAL, ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.
District Development Officer & Anr. – Appellant(s)
VERSUS
Satish Kantilal Amrelia – Respondent(s)
CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 19857-19858 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) Nos.11956-11957 of 2015)
Decided On : 28-11-2017
(2014) 7 SCC 177 – Relied upon
Facts of the case:
The appellant is the Panchayat Department of State of Gujarat having its office at Bhavnagar. The respondent -Satish Kantilal Amrelia worked in the appellant's Revenue Department at Bhavnagar as a Peon-cum-Driver on daily wages from 18.12.1989 to 31.05.1990 (5 months 15 days) and then started giving his services again as daily wager in appellant's another branch (Small Saving) from 01.06.1990 to 12.02.1992 (1 year 9 months) on daily payment of Rs.27.55 (Rs.Twenty Seven and Fifty Five Paisa). The respondent's tenure was then discontinued with effect from 12.02.1992 vide order dated 23.03.1992 (Annexure P-4).
The respondent aggrieved of his termination, initiated two actions against the appellant. First, he filed a civil suit challenging his termination order dated 23.03.1992. During the pendency of the civil suit, he also approached to the State (Labour Commissioner) and prayed for making Industrial Reference to the concerned Labour Court under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for deciding the legality and propriety of his termination order.
The Labour Commissioner made an Industrial Reference.
The respondent’s suit was decreed, the termination order and directed the appellant (State) was directed to re-instate the respondent in service with all consequential benefits.
The appellant filed first appeal which was allowed. In substance, the Appellate Court upheld the respondent's termination order.
The Labour Court, however, answered the Reference in respondent's favour and directed the appellant (State) to re-instate the respondent in service along with payment of 40% back wages.
The appellant (State) filed writ petition which was dismissed.
The Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed in default. The appellant applied for restoration of the Letters Patent Appeal but it was dismissed.
Finding of the Court:
Termination was bad for violation of section 25-G.
Result: Appeal partly allowed.
JUDGMENT
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.
1) Leave granted.
2) These appeals are filed against the final judgment and order dated 01.12.2014 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Civil Application No.10519 of 2014 in Letters Patent Appeal No.1878 of 2006, wherein the High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant herein in default and further declined to restore the appeal when prayed by the appellant. The Letters Patent Appeal arose out of judgment and final order of the Single Judge dated 21.04.2006 in Special Civil Application No.8390 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant and affirmed the Award dated 01.02.2006 passed by Labour Court, Bhavnagar in Reference Case No.166 of 1992.
3) The controversy involved in the appeals is confined to short facts, which, however, need mention hereinbelow to appreciate the same.
4) The appellant is the Panchayat Department of State of Gujarat having its office at Bhavnagar. The respondent -Satish Kantilal Amrelia worked in the appellant's Revenue Department at Bhavnagar as a Peon-cum-Driver on daily wages from 18.12.1989 to 31.05.1990 (5 months 15 days) and then started giving his services again as daily wager in appellant's another branch (Small Saving) from 01.06.1990 to 12.02.1992 (1 year 9 months) on daily payment of Rs.27.55 (Rs.Twenty Seven and Fifty Five Paisa). The respondent's tenure was then discontinued with effect from 12.02.1992 vide order dated 23.03.1992 (Annexure P-4).
5) The respondent felt aggrieved of his termination and initiated two actions against the appellant. In the first instance, challenging his termination order dated 23.03.1992 from the services, the respondent filed Civil Suit No.141 of 1992 in the Civil Court at Bhavnagar. During the pendency of the civil suit, he also approached to the State (Labour Commissioner) and prayed for making Industrial Reference to the concerned Labour Court under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for deciding the legality and propriety of his termination order.
6) The Labour Commissioner made an Industrial Reference No.166 of 1992 to the Labour Court No. 2 at Bhavnagar for deciding the legality and correctness of the termination order and for regularization of respondent's services.
7) The 2nd Joint Civil Judge (SD), Bhavnagar, vide judgment/decree dated 03.05.1994 decreed the respondent’s suit, set aside the termination order and directed the appellant (State) to re-instate the respondent in service with all consequential benefits.
8) Against the judgment/decree of the Trial Court, the appellant filed first appeal being Civil Appeal No.45/1994 before the Assistant Judge, Bhavnagar. The Appellate Court, by order dated 30.09.2003, allowed the appellant's appeal, set aside the judgment/decree of the Trial Court and dismissed the respondent's civil suit. In substance, the Appellate Court upheld the respondent's termination order.
9) The Labour Court, however, by Award dated 01.02.2006 (Annexure P-9) answered the Reference in respondent's favour. Applying the provisions of the Act, the Labour Court held that since the respondent was able to prove that he has worked for 240 days continuously in one previous calendar year, he was entitled to get the protection of the Act. It was held that it was a case of illegal retrenchment because the respondent was not paid any prior retrenchment compensation before termination of his services. The Labour Court also held that there was violation of Section 25-G of the Act in passing the termination order. The Labour Court accordingly directed the appellant(State) to re-instate the respondent in service along with payment of 40% back wages.
10) The appellant (State) felt aggrieved, filed writ petition (Special Civil Application No.8390/2006) before the High Court of Gujarat. By order dated 21.04.2006, the Single Judge dismissed the appellant's writ petition and affirmed the Award of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.