SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1098

KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Dengsailova – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. D.N. Goburdhan, Mr. Lal Ramtiamm, Mr. Abhishek Agrawal
For the Respondents: Mr. Raghavendra Bajaj, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Ms. Sushma Suri, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Mr. K.N. Madhusoodhanan, Mr. T.G. Narayanan Nair

JUDGMENT :

Kurian, J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

The question of law raised in this appeal on limitation is covered against the appellants by the judgment of this Court in Civil Appeal No. 3536 of 2008 titled as 'J. Thansiama v. State of Mizoram & Ors.' [2015 (8) JT 159]. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top