DIPAK MISRA, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
Centre For Public Interest Litigation – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General of The High Court of Delhi – Respondent
ORDER :
On 2nd November, 2015, this Court had passed the following order:-
“In course of hearing of these writ petitions, a suggestion was given to the learned counsel appearing for the parties that in the obtaining factual matrix of the case, there should be nomination of an examiner, who should peruse the answer scripts of the candidates and submit a valuation report to this Court. Needless to say, such a step is being thought of regard being had to the facts of the present case.”
2. Thereafter, on 14th December, 2015, this Court, after hearing Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel and Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A.D.N. Rao, learned counsel for the High Court of Delhi, had passed an order, the relevant portion of which reads as follows:-
“We have been apprised at the Bar that 659 candidates had qualified in the preliminary examination and appeared in the main examination and out of the same, 15 candidates have been selected after facing the interview. It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents that the total vacancies
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.