ORDER :

I.A. for impleadment is allowed. Let the applicant be added as respondent No.6. Cause title be rectified accordingly.

2. Heard Mr. Jayant Bhushan, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General for the State, Mr. Sanjiv Sen, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent no.5 and Dr. Rajiv Dhawan, learned senior counsel for the newly added respondent No.6.

3. This Court, on 02.03.2016, after hearing learned counsel for the parties, noting the conditions imposed by the State and referring to the decision in State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Indian Hotel and Restaurants Association Ors., (2013) 8 SCC 519 had directed as follows :

“Having heard learned counsel for the parties, Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, learned senior counsel, who sought permission to file an application for intervention and Mr. Sandeep Deshmukh, learned counsel for the 5th respondent, we are inclined to modify the said condition to the extent that CCTV cameras shall be fixed at the entrance of the premises in question but shall not be fixed in the restaurant or the permit area or the performance area.

As we have clarified the conditions, the modified conditions along with c