SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1222

A.K.SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Patel Kantilal Parshottamdas (D) – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Kumar Nanjibhai Mistry (D) Through LRS – Respondent


A.K. SIKRI, J.:–First, the facts and events in chronological order, as reading of these facts will facilitate proper understanding of the issues that have cropped up in the instant appeal of the dispute between the parties.

One Jeevandas was the owner of a part of property bearing plot Nos. 109 to 112, which was demarcated and known as sub-plot No.10 of the said plot. This sub-plot measures 828 square yards and is situated outside Shanpur Darwaza, Mahendi Kuva Road, Ahmedabad. Jeevandas executed a sale deed in respect of this plot (hereinafter referred to as the ‘suit property’) in favour of one Kantibhai (for short ‘Kanti’) on 16.04.1959 for 99 years, of which yearly rent fixed was Rs.1860/-. This lease deed also provided an option to the lessee to purchase the suit property. The lessee (Kanti) executed an Agreement of Sell dated 15.07.1974 in respect of the suit property in favour of one Jitenderkumar Nanjibhai (for short ‘Jitender’) at a total consideration of Rs.1,85,001/-. The purchaser paid earnest money of Rs.25,000/- at the time of execution of the said Agreement to Sell. This agreement further provided that the sale deed would be executed within a period of five months from













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top