SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 50

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
ORISSA LIFT IRRIGATION CORP. LTD – Appellant
Versus
RABI SANKAR PATRO – Respondent


ORDER

Uday Umesh Lalit, J.

1. These applications have been preferred seeking clarification and modification of directions issued by this Court in its Judgment and Order dated 03.11.2017 (“the judgment” for short) in Civil Appeal Nos.17869-17870 of 2017. Various directions were issued in the judgment and more particularly in paragraph No.53 of the judgment. The gist of the applications and the contentions advanced by the learned counsel were as follows:-

A] M.A. Nos. 1795-1796 of 2017 in CIVIL APPEAL Nos.17869-17870 of 2017 (I.A. No.138771 of 2017)
MA 1797-1798/2017 in C.A. No. 17869-17870/2017 (I.A. No.138778 of 2017)
MA 1799-1800/2017 in C.A. No. 17869-17870/2017(I.A. No.13890 of 2017)
MA 1801-1802/2017 in C.A. No. 17869-17870/2017 (I.A. No.138791 of 2017)
MA 1803-1804/2017 in C.A. No. 17869-17870/2017 (I.A. No.138793 of 2017)
MA 1805-1806/2017 in C.A. No. 17869-17870/2017(I.A. No.138795 of 2017)
The applicants, holding diploma
s in Engineering, enrolled themselves in 2005 in courses leading to award of B.Tech degree offered by Deemed to be University in question through distance learning mode. Later, on the basis of the degrees awarded by the Deemed to be Universities, they underwe










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top