SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 79

R.K.AGRAWAL, A.M.SAPRE
H. V. Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
R. Sharmila – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises from the final judgment and order dated 20.09.2011 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in RFA No.1128 of 2008 whereby the High Court set aside the judgment of the Trial Court and decreed the suit filed by the plaintiff.

3. In order to appreciate the issues involved in the appeal, it is necessary to set out the relevant facts hereinbelow.

4. The appellants are defendant Nos. 2 and 3, whereas respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and respondent No. 2 is defendant No. 1 in the civil suit, out of which this appeal arises.

5. The dispute is essentially between the family members and it relates to certain immovable properties originally belonged to the Head of the family known as - Ramaiah. The family tree would be useful to appreciate the issues.     

Ramaiah @ Ramaiah Reddy (died on 26.11.1995)

Smt. Hemavathi

(1st wife died : 24.2.89)

Smt. H.V. Nirmala

(2nd wife) Defendant 2

(i) R. Sharmila

(daughter – Plaintiff) &

Rakesh Babu

(son – Defendant 3)

(ii) Umesh (son – Defendant 1)

6. Ra













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top