SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 82

R.K.AGRAWAL, A.M.SAPRE
N. C. Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is filed by the plaintiff against the final judgment and order dated 19.12.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in CM(M) No. 1223 of 2016 whereby the High Court dismissed the petition and upheld the order of the Trial Court dated 21.09.2016 in Civil Suit No.7930 of 2016.

3. In order to decide the short question, it is not necessary to set out the facts in detail and mentioning of the few facts alone would suffice.

4. The controversy involved in the appeal is whether the two Courts below were justified in dismissing the three applications filed by the plaintiff in a pending suit, namely, (i) application under Order 7 Rule 14 of the Code for filing of documents, (ii) application under Order 6 Rule17 of the Code seeking amendment in the plaint, and (iii) application seeking directions against the respondents for production of some original documents.

5. The appellant is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants in the suit out of which this appeal arises.

6. The appellant (plaintiff) has filed a civil suit being Civil Suit No. 252/2005 now renumbered as (C.S. No 7930/2016) against the respondents (d





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top