A.K.SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
ESSAR TELEHOLDINGS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ashok Bhushan, J.
Delay Condoned. Leave granted.
2. This appeal when alongwith several appeals were heard on 16.11.2016, this Court noticed that in batch of cases, four questions have arisen. The present batch of cases of which Civil Appeal No. 2165 is a leading case relates only to Question No.2, which is to the following effect:-
Whether Rule 8D is retrospectively applicable?"
3. All these appeals raising only above question of law have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. For deciding all these appeals, it shall be sufficient to refer facts and proceedings in Civil Appeal No. 2165 of 2012.
FACTS
Civil Appeal No. 2165 of 2012
4. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of Bombay High Court dated 12.09.2011 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 947 of 2011 by which judgment the High Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax following an earlier judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 12.08.2010 in the case of Godrej Boyce and Manufacturing Company Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Meerut v. Sharvan Kumar Swarup
Commissioner of Income Tax I, Ahmedabad v. Gold Coin Health Food Private Limited
Commissioner of Income Tax – III v. Calcutta Knitwears, Ludhiana
Govind Das v. The Income Tax officer
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central – 1 New Delhi) v. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.
Jayam and Company v. Assistant Commissioner
State of Jharkhand v. Shiv Karampal Sahu
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.