ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, NAVIN SINHA
Chhabildas – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.F. Nariman, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The present case concerns a purchase notice issued under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and, in particular, the effect of Sub-section (7) thereof. The aforesaid Section 49 along with other relevant provisions of the Act, as they stood at the relevant time, are reproduced hereunder:
Section 49 - Obligation to acquire land on refusal of permission or on grant of permission in certain cases.-
(1) Where-
(a) any land is designated by a plan as subject to compulsory acquisition, or
(b) any land is allotted by a plan for the purpose of any functions of a Government or local authority or statutory body, or is land designated in such plan as a site proposed to be developed for the purposes of any functions of any such Government, authority or body, or
(c) any land is indicated in any plan as land on which a highway is proposed to be constructed or included, or
(d) any land for the development of which permission is refused or is granted subject to conditions, and any owner of land referred to in clause (a), (b), (c) or (d) claims-
(i) that the land has become incapable of reasonabl
Girnar Traders v. State of Maharashtra
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Dr. Hakimwadi Tenants Association
Shrirampur Municipal Council v. Satyabhamabai Bhimaji Dawkher
Prakash R. Gupta v. Lonavala Municipal Council
Hasmukhrai V. Mehta v. State of Maharashtra
Vijayalakshmi v. Town Planning Member (2006) 8 SCC 502 – Relied upon [Para 29]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.