JUDGMENT :

D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

1. The appellant manufactures home appliances such as mixer grinders, wet grinders and gas stoves. According to the appellant, based on a regular trade practice, it allows discounts to its distributors. These discounts may take the form of a scheme discount or, as the case may be, a quantity discount. The appellant claims the discount as a deduction from the total turnover while arriving at the taxable turnover under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act 2003 (‘the Act’).

2. On 29 May 2010, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bengaluru disallowed the quantity discount accorded by the appellant to its distributors on the ground that the discount was not relatable to the sales effected by the relevant tax invoices. The assessing authority held that the quantity discount offered by the appellant could not be allowed under Rule 3(2)(c) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules 2005 (‘the Rules’). The period in question was 1 April, 2006 to 31 March, 2007, 1 April, 2007 to 31 March, 2008 and 1 April, 2008 to 31 March, 2009.

3. On appeal, the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals – 1), Bengaluru set aside the order of the assessing authority, holdi